Source - http://www.bloomberg.com/
By - Elizabeth Lopatto
Category - Family Hotels In Miami
Posted By - Inn and Suites In West Miami
By - Elizabeth Lopatto
Category - Family Hotels In Miami
Posted By - Inn and Suites In West Miami
Family Hotels In Miami |
Positive opinions are more influential than negative ones, at least on the Internet.
If an article is “liked” on a website such as Facebook or Reddit, new readers are more likely to approve of it, according to a study
published in the journal Science. While the positive reactions create a
“herding” effect, the authors said, negative views don’t appear to
affect people the same way.
Using an undisclosed news-aggregation website, the scientists
tinkered with the favorability ratings of certain comments on the site.
The comments that got a positive boost from the researchers subsequently
took off in popularity, receiving a 25 percent higher rating on average
from other users. In other words, people believe the hype -- at least
some of the time. That’s not always a good thing, researchers said.
“If
someone’s made a comment about a product I want to buy, I assume it’s
useful if it’s been voted up and not useful if it’s voted down,” said Matthew O. Jackson, a professor of economics at Stanford University near Palo Alto, California,
who wasn’t involved in the research. “So we care that the right things
are pushed up. It’s a good sorting device for information, and if it’s
not being done well, that’s bad news.”
Stories categorized as
politics, culture and society and business generated the positive
bandwagon response, while those under economics, IT, fun, and general
news didn’t.
What’s more, when the site altered ratings in a
negative direction, people were more skeptical, the study authors found,
and were more likely to cancel out a negative vote with a positive
vote.
Positive Reinforcement
“One possibility is that
seeing something positive makes you feel better about seeing something
positive, and if you see something negative, you react to try to bring
it back to zero,” Jackson said in a telephone interview.
Researchers
during the five-month study randomly altered the ratings of 101,000
comments. Those manipulated to be more positive were about one-third
more likely than unaltered comments to receive a positive rating from
the next viewer, and 30 percent more likely to achieve a high favorable
rating.
The results published yesterday suggest a certain
skepticism about using the collective judgment to evaluate the quality
of products or ideas, the researchers said.
“These positive ratings also represent bias and inflation,” said Sinan Aral,
a study author and associate professor at the Massachusetts Institute
of Technology Sloan School of Management, in a statement. “The housing
bubble was a spread of positivity, but when it burst, some people lost
their savings and their houses went underwater.”
No comments:
Post a Comment