Source - http://www.latimes.com/
By -
Category - Attractions In West Miami
Posted By - Inn and Suites In West Miami
By -
Category - Attractions In West Miami
Posted By - Inn and Suites In West Miami
Attractions In West Miami |
People with brain damage that has left them mute and motionless may
be able to communicate with a system that measures the size of their
pupils, a new study has found.
Individuals suffering from "locked-in syndrome" have lost
motor control but remain aware and alert. The rare condition usually
results when damage occurs to the brainstem, which controls motor
function. Stroke, traumatic brain injury and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (also known as Lou Gehrig's disease) can cause locked-in syndrome.
Many locked-in syndrome patients communicate with an alphabet chart,
blinking to indicate their choices as a caretaker points to each letter.
Others use devices that measure eye movement patterns representing
"yes" or "no." Completely locked-in patients who aren't able to move
their eyes at will may be able to use systems that translate brain
activity into speech, although these often require surgical implantation
and special training.
A new system called the EyeSeeCam measures changes in pupil size that
happen involuntarily — even in people who lack motor control — and
decodes them into yes or no responses, potentially offering an easier
alternative for locked-in syndrome patients, including completely
locked-in individuals.
In the 1960s, researchers discovered that pupil size can be used to
measure mental effort: The bigger a person's pupils, the harder his or
her brain is working. Neuroscientists used these findings to develop the
EyeSeeCam, which takes advantage of how people's pupils dilate when
they try to solve math problems.
Since this happens automatically, patients don't need to be trained
to use the EyeSeeCam, said Wolfgang Einhauser, a neurophysicist at
Philipp University of Marburg in Germany who helped develop the device.
It's also relatively inexpensive, consisting of just a camera and
laptop.
In a trial described Monday
in the journal Current Biology, Einhauser and his colleagues asked
patients 15 simple questions, such as "Are you 20 years old?" After each
question, the computer presented the patient with yes or no options
while showing a math problem onscreen.
Patients solved only the problem associated with their response, and
the mental effort caused their pupils to dilate. An infrared camera
mounted to a headpiece measured their pupil size over time and sent the
information to a laptop. A software program immediately translated the
measurements into responses based on when they peaked.
When the researchers tested the EyeSeeCam on six healthy individuals,
it decoded their pupil sizes into accurate answers almost every time.
The researchers saw similar results in three out of seven locked-in
syndrome patients, almost all of whom could manage small head movements.
With some slight adjustments, it correctly translated the pupil
dilations of two additional patients more than 70% of the time.
"We found that quite remarkable," Einhauser said.
Only one out of four patients with more severe locked-in syndrome —
marked by more widespread brain damage — finished the trial, and his
answers were no more accurate than guessing.
The researchers also tested the EyeSeeCam on a minimally conscious
patient with severely impaired cognitive ability. Although he couldn't
answer the questions independently, he was able to solve math problems
if the researchers pointed at them. The system translated these
responses with more than 80% accuracy, suggesting that it could also
serve as a diagnostic tool to assess a patient's state of consciousness,
the researchers wrote.
Within the next two years, the researchers hope to finish fine-tuning
the EyeSeeCam so that it works better for severe locked-in syndrome
cases, Einhauser said. They also plan to make the device less
cumbersome. It will eventually resemble a small webcam that can be
hooked up to a laptop.
Although completely locked-in patients stand to benefit most from the
EyeSeeCam, the trial participants still had control over their eye
movements, said Niels Birbaumer, a neurophysicist at the University of
Tuebingen in Germany who was not involved in the study. As a result, "we
have no idea whether pupil size" accurately reflects yes or no
responses, he said.
Mark Delargy, a physician at Ireland's National Rehabilitation
Hospital, agreed. Although the study controlled for lighting changes and
other environmental factors that can affect pupil size, internal
variables, such as emotional state, are more difficult to control.
Anxiety and pain can cause the pupils to dilate, for example.
But identifying these emotions in locked-in patients is tricky. "They
won't tell you any new information," said Delargy, who was not part of
the study. "You have to devise a question to enable them to tell you."
The EyeSeeCam's success in the minimally conscious participant has
made the researchers confident that pupil dilation can serve as a means
of communication, Einhauser said. Now that they've "provided the proof
of principle," testing the system on completely locked-in patients is
"definitely on the agenda," he said.
Even if pupil size does accurately reflect yes or no responses, the
study tested only the EyeSeeCam, so it's undetermined whether it offers
an advantage over existing systems, Birbaumer said.
Still, the device "has potential," Delargy said. "This is one of the
greatest hopes for rehabilitation of locked-in patients and for the
opportunity to give a voice to people who have lost it."
No comments:
Post a Comment